Stell War: Arcelor Vs Mittal
ABSTRACT
This case describes the hostile takeover bid by Mittal steel for Arcelor steel in what turned out to be one of the most acrimonious takeovers in European history. The battle began in January 2006 and lasted six months. From the outset, Arcelor's management resisted Mittal's deal using every possible defense involving politicians, bankers and public relations advisors, among others. There was even a proposed merger with a Russian company in a desperate effort to avoid the hostile takeover bid. Finally, on 25 June 2006, after the fierce battle that included allegations of racism and much animosity, Arcelor heeded its shareholders' wishes and accepted the bid. The initial offer was 18.6 billion and the final price paid by Mittal was 26.9 billion. During the six months, Mittal's share price had increased by almost 25%, with Arcelor's more than doubling. This case is intended to address three sets of questions:
How has the market for corporate control changed in continental Europe in response to globalized industry economics and associated competitive pressures, as well as performance pressure from institutional investors controlling global equity holdings?
What are the mechanics of hostile M&A transactions today in Europe, including the involvement of governments as owners and rule-makers, block shareholders, employees and other stakeholders?
What do investment bankers add to such transactions?
The answers to the above questions are given in conjunction with the following analysis of the European Merger and Acquisitions Services.
REFERENCES
Aaron, Roger, S., Simpson, Scott V., and Corte, Lorenzo, A., 2006 Trends in Cross-Border M&A: A European prospective with a U.S. Commentary. ICLG: Mergers & Acquisitions 2007.
ArcelorMittal Company’s Activity Report, 2006
ArcelorMittal-Financial and Strategic Analysis Review, 2007
Bruner, R.F. (2004), “Applied mergers and acquisitions,” John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey.
Campa, J.M. and Hernando, I. (2006), “M&A Performance in the European Financial Industry,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, pp. 3367-3392.
Campa, Jose, M. and Moschiere, The European M&A Industry: Trends, Patterns and Shortcomings, IESE Business School-University of Navarra.
Capaldo, A., Dobbs, R. and Suonio, H. (2008), “Deal making in 2007: Is the M&A boom over?” McKinsey Quarterly, 1.
Carlos Amman, Managing Vice President and Nadia Kubis, principal, Booz & Company, Switzerland. This article is an extract from European Mergers & Acquisitions: Prospects for the decade, the comprehensive 253-page report from IFR Market Intelligence.
Hatchard, Michael E., Mayer, Bernd R., Oosterhuis, Paul W., Sanders, Tim, Pierre, Servan-Schreiber, Simpson, Scott V. “Trends in European Mergers and Acquisitions,” Skadden European Mergers and Acquisitions, Leaders Magazine, Inc., 148 Leaders Volume 29, Number 4.
MaCahery, J., Renneboog, L., Ritter, P., and Haller, S., (2003), “The economics of the proposed European takeover directive,” CEPS Research Report in Finance and Banking, 32.
Martynova, M. and Renneboog, L. (2006), “Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe,” Tilburg U. Working Paper.
Smith, Roy C. and Walter I. "Global Banking Second Edition. Oxford University Press.
Walter, Ingo, (2007), The Steel War: Mittal vs. Arcelor, Teaching Note, INSEAD The Business School for the World.